Middle East atemporal

septembrie 19, 2011

Brzezinski: The Last American Cowboy “Spills the Beans”

Editor: Sit through the entire video. Take notes on the issues brought up. This is a rare opportunity, nobody could say these things and survive but Brzezinski. It is so rare finding our publication, one considered “edgy” so “dead on” with one of the world’s top poliitical advisors, and not for the first time. VT as an international publication exists to define America’s global role, proving we are not a nation of dupes and conspiracy freaks, the position the mainstream media has sold to the world for years.

Ambushing MSNBC, Zbigniew Brzezinski Lays Out A Foundation For Real Americans

 

By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor

 

I want to thank Debbie Menon of our Middle East Bureau for landing this on my desk this morning.  This is the most important political policy statement made by any American in years.

Brzezinski, a director of the Council on Foreign Relations, is by far, the “brightest bulb” America has.

This is the only statement of its kind that lays out issues of American and EU security, that speaks honestly about Israel and Palestine and addresses the Pakistani situation.

He goes two steps further, taking America’s poltical “loonies” as he calls them “to the woodshed” and, avoiding the term “class war,” speaks of the real violence of poverty, of the real extremism from above, the top 1% looting the world and what it will cost us all.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/44532986#44532986

 

Catching readers on the underside of the video.  Save the article.  We are going to be working with this video a bit more this week and I hope to be discussing it on radio and TV, if allowed.  If you don’t mind, I would take a minute or two to bring out a few of the issues here that caught my eye.

First of all, over the last week or two, I have been addressing American Jews.  VT already has a huge readership in Israel, seen by some as the voice of the anti-Netanyahu political parties and others as excessively pro-Palestinian.

Two points Brzezinski makes fit together too well.  Israel is certainly more isolated than any time since 1948.  At that time, Ben Guirion’s military expertise and considerable backing allowed Israel to assume a 5 to 1 advantage over her Arab foes. The issue then, the issue driving that conflict, one repeated on a variety of scales, one misrepresented in history is the fate of the Palestinian people.

Trust me on this.

Israel has to make the deal with the least offensive organization it can, a rare opportunity.  The Gaza wall has to come down and “right of return” has to be established.  Palestinians have to be able to return to their land.  Opposing the UN vote is insanity, there is nothing to win and everything to lose.

The issue is not blame, not war crimes but of restoring hope for some and building a future for the region, everyone in the region, a future that doesn’t require a huge mercenary army and nuclear weapons to guarantee.

A generation of Israeli’s are facing the uncertainty this brings.  The warnings of Netanyahu, mass murder and terrorism are bunkum. However, the challenge is great, mistakes have to be redressed, mistakes too many are totally unaware of and a solution has to be negotiated.  The United States is the only power, backed by the new “populist” regimes of the region, a real source of uncertainty, the EU, Russia and China, in underwriting the solution.  Saudi and Gulf money are part of it.

As stated by Brzezinski, Iran has to be brought to the table over a long term solution to the Afghan war.

However, it isn’t about Afghanistan, it has always been about Paksitan.  The solution the British chose for the region in 1947 was meant to cause what we are seeing today, a solution formultated by ignorance and ill will.

The region is going to require a trade and development scheme spreading from China to Iran, north into the “stans,” the republics of the former Soviet Union, a solution respecting the aspirations of the people of the region, every ethnic group, not just those militarized through the Taliban, offering each a share in regional prosperity.

The poverty Brzezinski talks about in America, 46 million poor while millionaires paying no taxes party on, decades of senseless economic policy of debt, war, borrowing and insanity, backed even further by the “lunacy” of the worst pack of Republican candidates we have ever seen…

No wonder Dick Cheney has asked Hillary Clinton to offer a primary challenge to President Obama.  As Obama has finally begun to take the grips of state, offending Israel with realistic foreign policy and demanding that wealthy Americans begin paying for their decades of failed “Reaganomics” free ride, Cheney, biggest lunatic of them all, works to divide.

The real vulnerability of America is the insanity of the United States Supreme Court, as pointed out by former President Jimmie Carter this week.

Allowing corporate money, let’s be honest, a flood of drug money, “cartel money” to flow into the Tea Party, flow into the “lunatics” Brzezinski describes, and this is where all this money is going, joined by the massive power of the Israeli lobby, will, in the end, as Brzezinski describes, bring down, not just America but Israel as well.

Generations of American Jewish political tradition have been thrown aside for the extremism of greed and the extremist policies of the worst government in Israel’s history.  However, with Israel isolated and new governments, increasingly hostile surrounding them for the first real time in Israel’s history of “crying wolf,” it is time for moral decisions, for real consideration of Israel’s survival as the state it was always intended to be, certainly not a Jewish state, and for a return to intelligent policy where America can take on an international role long abandoned because of the degeneration of domestic politics.

American Jews should note, the Israel lobby in the United States doesn’t like Jewish candidates. Jews aren’t politically extremist enough for them.

We are challenged as never before with real problems of survival. I contend that 9/11 represented the overthrow of the American government by an international cabal intent on destabilizing Central Asia for drugs, first drugs, then oil, then war profiteering while the world’s currencies, particularly the dollar and euro, were destroyed. The pattern of assault during the “W” Bush era is clear but there has yet to be a real look at the criminality within the European Union as well. “Greece” was not an accident nor is the debt crisis in Italy or the one in France that is being hidden from
us.

I recently returned from meetings in Nigeria. While there, I had broad discussions, security, terrorism but mostly economic issues. I have talked little of this. My message to the new president was that he had 100 days to begin delivering hope to the people of Nigeria. I warned that car bombings would begin in Abuja, I told his Chief of Security why, even where.

Despite a sea of oil and gas, Nigeria is flat broke. I brought in promises of international credit but only based on realistic development plans. First among these was electric power. We had to “turn on the lights” across the country, using equipment rusting away for 5 years, billions of dollars of it paid for and abandoned by an earlier regime. Civil war is a real issue in Nigeria and political feelings there, in a nation of nearly 200 million, run high.

Poverty there is at near unbelievable levels and few have any hope.

The hundred days is over. The teams are ready to install power generation equipment, investors stand ready to bring in new industry but, as with the United States and the Obama government, simply taking office doesn’t mean you can rule. Powerful people want Nigeria to fail, want a civil war, profit by poverty and ignorance, not just in Nigeria but Pakistan as well and even in the United States.

Thus, when some spoke of Gaddafi, who delivered millions in development funds while billions disappeared as a “hero,” by some standards they were correct. Many do nothing at all.

I can go to Nigeria and point fingers, at this general or that minister, at this or that failure but if you want to see failure, come to America. See 15 trillion dollars in debt, see wars a decade old started by a phony terrorist attack, and categorically, 9/11 was a false flag attack engineered by lunatics within our own system exactly as Osama bin Laden told us so long ago.

The secrets of our past are all coming out. Americans are no longer remaining silent. Two days ago I sat through a briefing on the 1986 attack on Libya. American teams, Special Forces, were brought in to “paint” targets. Gaddafi knew. He knew of the attack in advance. The whole thing was theatre, a ruse, as were the club bombings in Berlin and the Lockerbie crash.

As was 9/11. It is all coming out, it can’t be stopped. Those of the “secret world’ are no longer remaining silent.

What is Brzezinski telling us? He isn’t calling it “class war.” However, this is very much what it is. Picture a divorce court. Two lawyers scream insults at each other while their clients rage and sulk. Then the lawyers, the lawyers and the judge go to lunch together as they do every day and laugh.

It was all theatre.

The victims are those who believe, believe the Tea Party, believe Netanyahu, believe those who say taxing corporations will destroy the world, believe gas and oil pricing isn’t manipulated.

Believe that 30 million illegal immigrants couldn’t walk into the United States, half of them during the last Bush administration without the planning and approval of the US Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers, the “union buster’ wing of the Republican party.

Illegal immigrants exist politically for one reason, to destroy labor. As for their other costs? The rich who pay no taxes could care less. It is all theatre like the truck loads of dope brought in from Mexico, blamed on cartels we really know are headquartered in Washington, the same cartels bringing planeloads of heroin into Europe and America and trucks of heroin into Russia, also headquartered in Washington.

Half the leaders of these cartels are serving officers in our military and CIA, the rest, members of congress. I am not guessing on this, the proof is there and requires very little digging.

The dollar amounts are in the tens of billions and are buying governments across America, congressional races, judgeships, police departments, we all know the story, it is an old one oft repeated.

Today, Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Carter’s former National Security Advisor, a director of the oft maligned Council on Foreign Relations, spoke a wealth of truth and offered real solutions. He spoke of hope that Americans would come to their senses.

I hope he is right.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/09/19/brzezinski-opens-up-the-last-american-cowboy/

Netanyahu owes Obama big time

First this: An amazing account of what President Obama did for Israel last week has just come to light. The president personally, without consultation with Congress, intervened to save six Israeli lives. Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu praised the president in a speech in Israel on September 10:

“I want to use this opportunity to thank US President Barack Obama. I requested his assistance at a decisive – I would even say fateful – moment. He said he would do everything possible, and this is what he did. He activated all of the United States’ means and influence – which are certainly considerable. I believe we owe him a special debt of gratitude.”

And, by coincidence, this is a good moment to repay that debt.

This is beginning to look like one of the worst periods in Israel’s history.

The Turkish government has essentially broken relations with Israel over Netanyahu’s refusal to apologise for storming the Mavi Marmara relief ship and killing nine Turkish nationals in the process. Ordinary Egyptians (not the government) attacked the Israeli embassy in Cairo, forcing all of its personnel to return home to Israel. And the Palestinians, having despaired of achieving anything in negotiations with Israel under current conditions, are taking their case to the United Nations, where an overwhelming majority of the General Assembly will endorse Palestinian statehood, even though Israel will still control the territory of the new state.

A perfect storm

Each of these events, standing alone, would be catastrophic for Israel. In combination, they create a perfect storm, one whose force can only be kept at bay by the US government. But our government is unwilling to do what will ultimately help Israel if it means publicly opposing Netanyahu in an election year.

That sounds counter-intuitive. Politicians always want to give Israel whatever it wants in an election year. But this time around, standing with Israel’s leader does not mean supporting Israel simply because it is he who, more than anyone else, is responsible for the tsunami heading towards his county’s shores.

He is the one who ended negotiations with the Palestinians by refusing to accede to Obama’s request for a settlement freeze. (Palestinians rightly refuse to negotiate while the land they are negotiating over is being gobbled up by settlers.) He is the one who refused to apologise to Turkey for killing its nationals, even after the United States devised a formula that both sides seemed happy with. Netanyahu backed down out of fear of his thuggish foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman. As for the Egyptians, they identify Netanyahu with the Mubarak regime, which barely raised a word of protest against the occupation of the West Bank or the strangulation of Gaza. Now the Israel-Egypt peace treaty, the most critical component of Israel’s security, is itself in jeopardy.

None of this happened overnight and all of it can be traced to the continuation of the 44-year-old occupation. Obama understands all of this, but when he tried to push the Israelis to start negotiations to end it once and for all, Israel’s ‘supporters’ in America went ballistic. When Netanyahu told them to get Obama to back down “to save Israel”, they did. AIPAC made sure that every member of Congress knew that they were being “scored” on the level of their support for Netanyahu. A low score meant closed checkbooks. Our president surrendered.

In that spirit, the US is opposing Palestinian statehood on Netanyahu’s behalf.

But not Israel’s. Israel is in big trouble and it needs allies who will help it prevail over this sea of misfortunes. It doesn’t have those allies. It just has self-proclaimed supporters in the habit of telling the Israeli government whatever it wants to hear.

Accordingly, there is no one who is telling Israel – from a position of strength – that it needs to end the occupation. The United States is, once again, playing the role of Israel’s enabler.

But there is another way…

Media reports indicate that the Obama administration is desperate to avoid the Palestinian statehood

IN depth
More from MJ Rosenberg:
Israel abandoned
Shooting ourselves in the foot at the UN
The disaster known as Netanyahu
Who funds Muslim-baiting in the US?
Glenn Beck is exploiting Israel

resolution from coming up for a vote at the UN later this month. What that really means is that the United States is desperate to avoid jeopardising US interests throughout the Arab and Muslim world (including our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan) by voting against the measure.

So why not vote “yes”?

The resolution simply codifies the US policy favoring a two-state solution. Because it will change nothing on the ground (the Israelis will still control all the territory), bilateral Israeli-Palestinian negotiations will still be necessary to achieve a final status agreement. The UN resolution does not substitute unilateralism for negotiation. It simply levels the playing field so that negotiations will be between two states, not one powerful state and one occupied supplicant.

Any real change on the ground requires mutual agreement by both sides on all the issues: borders, security arrangements, Jerusalem, water resources, settlements, refugees. Nothing would be rammed down either side’s throat because, as provided for in every significant proposal for negotiations (including all UN resolutions and the Arab League Initiative), every change in the status quo must be mutually agreed upon.

So what’s the problem?

The problem is that the United States has promised Netanyahu to veto the resolution in the Security Council. (The Palestinians might opt for the General Assembly, where they are likely to prevail, but actual recognition as a state can only be conferred by the Security Council).

But how about this?

The administration tells Israel and the Palestinians that we will vote “yes” in the Security Council (enabling passage) if the resolution includes language recognising Israel as a Jewish state. This is a new and superfluous condition that the Israeli right has come up with recently that threatens to destroy any possibility of an agreement. Palestinians see this demand for what it is: Moving the goal post. For the Israeli right, however, demanding recognition not just as Israel but “as a Jewish state”, represents their last-ditch condition to block peace if agreement is reached on everything else.

In fact, it is no big deal. Israel is going to be a Jewish state (unless, of course, the two-state solution is replaced by the one-state solution) no matter what it’s called. Palestinians know that.

Any Palestinian fear that “Jewish state” language will jeopardise the rights of Palestinian Israelis can itself be addressed within the UN resolution. It can include language echoing the Balfour Declaration, which called for a Jewish state with the caveat that it be “clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine.”

If the Palestinians agreed to the “Jewish state” formulation, the United States would not only be free to vote for the resolution but might be able to convince Israel to vote for it as well. And we would be well on the way to implementation of the two-state solution.

Netanyahu, for his part, owes Obama big time. How about, for once, giving the United States a break? Not to mention Israel.

MJ Rosenberg is a Senior Foreign Policy Fellow at the Media Matters Action Network.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial policy.

A version of this article was previously published on Foreign Policy Matters.

Source:
Al Jazeera

 

The US and hatred for Palestinians spills into the UN. Israel the gaoler state leads the way

The 1949 Green Line bordersImage via Wikipedia

US Pressuring Security Council To Vote Down Palestinian State

Palestinian Authority says the expected US veto would ‘destroy’ a Two State Solution

by John Glaser, September 17, 2011

The United States is working diligently topressure the other members of the United Nations Security Council to vote against next week’s Palestinian bid for statehood, hoping to avoid embarrassment on the international stage by having to invoke its veto power.

The Palestinian Authority on Saturday warned that a US veto would destroy any hope for a two-state solution. Paradoxically, the US leadership has said for months that submitting a request for Palestinian statehood along the internationally recognized border would be counterproductive to the goal of a two state solution, although never offering an explanation as to how.

Before resorting to pressuring others at the UNto thwart a Palestinian request for full membership, US diplomats David Hale and Dennis Ross tried presenting alternative measures to dissuade the PA from making the request. Palestinian negotiators were unimpressed with their proposals.

“This was the statement supposed to persuade Abu Mazen [Abbas] not to go?” PA negotiator Nabil Shaath said. His incredulity arose out of the fact that the US proposal made no mention of Israeli settlements, of the future of Jerusalem, or of refugees’ right of return. The US, he added, was “not a neutral observer, but a strategic ally of Israel”.

While the US has failed to make sense of its inexplicable objection – that UN-granted statehood would fail to give Palestinians their statehood – it appears the real objection comes from Israel’s sprawling settlements on Palestinian land. Settlement construction, which often follows eviction and destruction of Palestinian homes, has risen dramatically in recent months and Israel prefers that land belong to Israel. If Palestinian statehood is based on the legally recognized 1967 border, settlements would presumably have to be dismantled – thus Israeli and US objection.

http://www.ikners.com/?p=30237

 

septembrie 14, 2011

Turkey Anti-Israeli Friction Helps Palestinians

by Stephen Lendman

Prime Ministar Erdoğan observes his welcome ceremony next to an Egyptian senior official in Cairo, where he addressad an Arab League Foreign Ministers’ Council Meeting.

Egyptians celebrate Erdogan’s arrival

Borrowing the opening line from Dickens’ “Tale of Two Cities:”

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times….”

He referred to the French Revolution, promising “Liberte, egalite and fraternite.” Inspired by America’s, it began in 1789, ending 1,000 years of monarchal rule, benefitting the privileged only. A republic replaced it.

That was the good news. The bad was the wrong people took power. The moderate Jacobins lost out to extremists, ushering in a “reign of terror.”

Change doesn’t always work out, but when intolerable conditions exist, trying for something better is key. It holds for Palestinians wanting freedom from Israel’s repressive occupation. Statehood and full de jure UN membership is step one toward it, though no guarantee.

Palestinians have many global supporters, including Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Israeli crimes he opposes drew him closer, and he’s not shy about saying it and more.

On September 13, Turkey’s Today’s Zaman headlined, “Erdogan calls on Arab nations to unite, raise the Palestinian flag,” addressing a Tuesday Arab League meeting in Cairo.

He asked Arab countries and Turkey to close ranks so tightly “even daylight shall not pass between” us.

Calling for solidarity, he continued:

“We are living through a turning point in history, and we are called upon to cooperate more closely than ever. It is time for us to take responsibility for our common future.”

“Storms of applause” interrupted him several times.

He particularly aimed at Israel, saying what few leaders anywhere state publicly:

“While the Israeli administration tries to legitimize itself, it takes steps that shake its legitimacy in the region,” referring to Netanyahu’s refusal to apologize for murdering nine Turkish nationals aboard the Mavi Marmara aid ship in May 2010 as well as Cast Lead.

“The aggression of the Israeli administration has reached levels that threaten the future of the Israeli people,” as well as occupied Palestinians, especially in besieged Gaza.

He called Israeli-Palestinian relations “the heart of the conflict in the region.” Ruling out normalization, he said that won’t change unless Israel apologizes, pays just compensation for its crime, and ends its Gaza siege.

He also stressed that Israel reached a point of no return, calling the status quo “no longer sustainable.” He reiterated his intent to sue for ending Gaza’s siege in the International Court of Justice (ICJ).

He asked Arab states for support, saying “let’s all unfurl the Palestinian flag together, and let that flag be the symbol of peace and stability in the region.”

Whether he’s a sometime or permanent Palestinian friend matters less than what he’ll do now to support them. He calls Israel’s mentality an obstacle to peace, adding that Israelis endure their own blockade under Netanyahu and extremists around him – without naming names.

They’re in Washington as well as Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. Two of them headed back a second time to pressure Abbas  - Middle East envoy David Hale and special State Department advisor Dennis Ross (a notorious pro-Israeli hardliner).

Ma’an News said the Obama administration is scrambling to head off a Palestinian plan to seek full UN membership within 1967 borders during next week’s New York session.

Smart money says Abbas already caved despite publicly saying otherwise.

PA presidential office head Muhammad Shtayyeh said:

“We are going to the UN and to the Security Council and we will ask for full membership for a Palestinian state on the borders of 1967. This does not go against any efforts towards serious peace negotiations.”

Offering wiggle room, he added:

“We are open-minded to any proposal. And we are ready to engage with any proposal. But this is not a step to really stop us from going to the (UN). If the whole idea of (an 11th hour US or Israeli) proposal is to engage peacefully, then you don’t really bring it in the last five minutes of the hour.”

Abbas adviser Nabil Abu Rudeihah said:

“Americans failed to provide us or the Israelis with a platform for negotiations. They failed to stop or cease the settlement activities.”

Abbas always was “ready for negotiations on this clear basis, (including) 1967 borders with (agreed land) swaps, with a cessation of settlements. For this, we are ready to come back to negotiations.”

“As long as negotiations are not there,” the UN is the “only option we have to protect our people and our interests. We cannot keep this stalemate any more than this. That is why the UN is the only place that we can assert our rights.”

He added that occupation must finally end, even though statehood won’t assure it. He wants it “built, and we are ready….We are willing and ready to live side by side with an Israeli state.”

Israel and Washington, of course, object, with plenty of financial, political and belligerent muscle for backup.

As a result, neutral observers say it’s unclear what Abbas will propose. As noted above and in previous articles, smart money says he’ll cave.

Criticizing his own government, Haaretz writer Gideon Levy called the bunch “dangerous pyromaniacs without equal.” He scathed Netanyahu whose stubbornness is costing Israel regional allies.

He called Avigdor Lieberman “our thuggish foreign minister.” He should have compared him to Hillary Clinton, matching him blow for blow and then some.

He asked what will Egypt do “now that Turkey has almost entirely severed relations?….What new depths will this lead us into?”

He quoted Yiddish poet/songwriter Mordechai Gebirig (1887 – 1942) saying:

“Our town is burning, brothers, burning. Our whole town burns! And you stand looking on with folded arms and shake your heads. You stand looking on with folded arms, while the fire spreads!”

A Polish national under Nazi occupation, he tried to mobilize Krakow’s resistance before dying on “Bloody Thursday,” June 4, 1942, in its ghetto. He remains the preeminent Yiddish literature and song folk artist.

Israel’s fire today is self-inflicted. Why aren’t Israelis protesting against it along with calls for social justice?

All just causes are inseparable, including for Palestinians and Israeli Arabs. Yet Israel treats 20% of its population like fifth column threats, not citizens.

Where’s the righteous indignation? Where’s the national awakening that Palestinians deserve rights like Jews? Where’s the throw the bums out mentality, but not for new ones? When comes understanding that injustice to anyone affects all?

Where’s the spirit to rise up and act – courageously for what’s right over wrong, especially targeting rogue leaders needing to be removed?

It’s high time Palestinians got “Liberte, Egalite, and Fraternite,” starting with statehood and full de jure UN membership.

They need supportive Israelis for it as intensively as for social justice, damning Netanyahu and Obama for opposing it.

They need pressure applied to Abbas to deliver in New York, not collaborate with Israel and Washington as now appears likely for an unacceptable alternative.

They need all the friends they can get when the moment of truth arrives.

It’s days away. Will it be Palestinian spring or winter?


Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.

Theme: Rubric. Bloguieşte pe WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 72 other followers