By way of deception, thou shalt do war.
Dr. Alan Sabrosky, a former U.S. Marine who received his Ph.D. from the University of Michigan, was the Director of Studies, Strategic Studies Institute, at the U.S. Army War College. He has taught at top universities and is one of the nation’s most strategic, analytical thinkers. He has said, flat out, that Israel was behind 9/11, a subject I wrote in detail about last week:
…only two intelligence agencies had the expertise, assets, access and political protection to execute 9/11 in the air and on the ground: our CIA and Israel’s Mossad. Only one had the incentive, using the „who benefits” principal: Mossad. And that incentive dovetailed perfectly with the neo-con’s agenda and explicitly expressed need for a catalytic event to mobilize the American public for the wars, using American military power to destroy Israel’s enemies. Only the unexpected strength of the Iraqi resistance kept Syria and Iran from being attacked in the second Bush Administration. Thus, the evidential trail for 9/11 and the wars in Afghanistan & Iraq run from PNAC, AIPAC and their cohorts; through the mostly Jewish neo-cons in the Bush Administration; and back to the Israeli government.
A brief sampling of Zionist neo-con policy papers preparing for 9/11:
I first stumbled upon Dr. Alan Sabrosky’s work listening to this March 29, 2010 interview he did with Daryl Bradford Smith and Ognir (ofThe Information Underground), in which he explains, quite thoroughly, that Israel was behind the false flag attack on 9/11. Prior to Dr. Sabrosky’s March 2010 interview with Smith and Ognir, he was on Mark Glenn and Phil Tourney’s radio program, posted below.
Dr. Sabrosky has written many important articles in the past few years, but recently published at Veteran’s Today his most important one yet. He outlines, in very basic, simple terms, the most critical, game-changing event in this young century, who was behind it, and how we should go about reversing the parasitic death grip the state of Israel and international Zionism has on the U.S. government and society.
Dr. Sabrosky begins his piece by explaining his transition from a supporter of the state of Israel in the 1960s, to an ardent critic, in particular in light of the devastating Israeli attack on the USS Liberty in June 1967, an attack which could have been stopped with air support from nearby U.S. aircraft carriers, but was thwarted– twice– by the White House. Dr. Sabrosky could have listed many other instances ofthe long history of Zionist brutality, false flag terrorism, war crimes, assassinations, expropriation of Palestinian land and property, espionage and infiltration of foreign governments, arrogant racism and murder of U.S. citizens.
Democracy Now coverage of Rachel Corrie, a 23-year-old student murdered by the Israelis in cold blood, run over by a bulldozer no less.
The main point he underscores is that 9/11 is the key issue that needs to be addressed, that Israel was behind it, and World Trade Center building 7 is not just the smoking gun, but the „smoking artillery shell” in the room. He links to this video for emphasis:
He details in the article the overwhelming evidence linking the state of Israel to the 9/11 false flag attacks, mentioning the fact that the security company responsible for the World Trade Centers, Kroll Associates, was „owned & operated by Zionists, as was the WTC itself as of July 2001.” He also mentions the fact that the privately owned ICTS, an Israeli security company, was operating at all 3 airports the supposed hijackers took off from.
Here are some other sources tying the state of Israel and international Zionism to the false flag attack on 9/11:
- Solving 9-11: The Deception That Changed The World
- WikiLeaks, Israel, and the 9/11 Crime Gang
- Police Report: Israelis arrested on 9/11
- The Israeli „art student” mystery
- British Intelligence Reports: Mossad ran 9/11 Arab „hijacker” terrorist operation
- Israel did 9/11- ALL THE PROOF IN THE WORLD
Dr. Sabrosky then explains just what the U.S. is supporting, throughbillions of dollars in aid and other financial assistance, political cover at the U.N. and in the world community, and refusing to part with the state of Israel on any major issue: a dangerous nuclear-armed pariah, terrorist-criminal state, engaged in theft, genocide, and ethnic cleansing on an unimaginable scale.
Wake Up America ! israel war crime by walidostrios
He also goes into the role ultra-Orthodox Judaism and it’s toleration have in a largely secular populace, which permeates into a rapid ultranationalist, racist and xenophobic strand in Israeli society.
The last part of Dr. Sabrosky’s article discusses the role the Zionist-owned media has played in covering up the false flag attack on 9/11, not to mention the other crimes against humanity and wars of aggression launched as a result of 9/11.
…it’s [Veterans Today] an attempt to bring together at least two of the major themes in the community that is in opposition to the whole host of Israeli, Zionist bits of militarism, activities, actions. One in the United States which is largely focused on 9/11, and although people may not like to hear this, you know, for almost all Americans, even if they knew what the Israelis were doing to Palestine, most of them wouldn’t care. They really wouldn’t. They, like most other people, are concerned with what is done to them, and that’s 9/11, which is an open wound and the wars that came from it.
Internationally it’s the reverse. People there are obviously aware of 9/11, they understand the implications for the United States, but when I speak with friends in Germany, or Britain, or France, or different Asian and Latin American countries, for them it’s Palestine and Gaza, and 9/11 is sort of a secondary issue.
…what I see on Veterans Today is a powerful set of writings, some by editors and more or less regular contributors, others outside it, who put both of them side by side, so that the readership of Veterans Today will get good arguments on 9/11, but they’ll also get good arguments on Israeli policy and it’s manipulation of American governmental policy, on Palestine and collateral issues. And that I think is important.
We have all been sort of like a gaggle of duck hunters standing in a circle blasting birdshot outward and upward in a thousand different directions, on a thousand or more issues, in so much detail, that not only do none of us really understand it, the general public in America and elsewhere, who doesn’t even know that these are issues, is hopelessly confused at best, and totally turned off at worse. And that is a generic problem.
There is an absence of focus, there is an absence of whatGerman strategists call the schwerpunkt, you know the strategic center of gravity. And it’s on that that we need to focus, and none of us is really doing that….
The gate to containing Israeli ambitions, and to uncovering Israeli crimes, and thus saving Palestine, is in the United States, and not in Jerusalem or Gaza or Ramallah. Second, the lock to that gate is not in Washington or New York City, which are the centers of Zionist power, but in the heartland of the United States where they’re generally weak. And third, the key to that gate is 9/11. That is the issue.
9/11 is the schwerpunkt to this entire exercise. This is the one that has turned the United States around in its approach to the world. This is the one that is an open wound. This, and the wars which came from it, are the ones that concern Americans today….
Bodies come home because of the wars. The wars devolve from 9/11. Pin 9/11 on the Israelis, and this entire exercise begins to unravel for them.
If, and I acknowledge that it’s a big if, a classic grassroots approach, something like the so-called Tea Party used, can persuade enough people at the local level in the United States that Israel and its supporters here orchestrated 9/11, and thus the wars that ensued from 9/11, and are therefore responsible for the lives, and treasure, and loss of personal freedom Americans have experienced, that doesn’t even count what we’ve done to others, then AIPAC and company are dead meet figuratively, politically, and quite possibly literally as well. And I think that applies to the people that supported them.
Dr. Sabrosky on 9/11 and the media (bold mine):
Very quickly after 9/11, you know, the mainstream media took essentially a 3 pronged attack. One, to effectively endorse the official government position. Second, is to deflect attention from anything except the Arabs….And then of course to disparage and belittle and mock those who question it.
…the only reason that the mainstream media, given its ownership, didn’t rip the government case apart is because they either knew, suspected or feared that the evidentiary trail would lead to Israel and its supporters.
 |
| The American public does not hear the truth about the false flag attack of 9/11 and Israeli involvement because the mainstream media is completely owned by Zionists, most of whom are Jewish. |
Dr. Sabrosky and others have argued that the most effective strategy for the future of the 9/11 Truth Movement may lay in local veterans organizations, and that outreach to these organizations is key. AtDaily Paul Liberty Forum we read:
[Dr. Sabrosky] has suggested that the nation’s salvation lies in the hands of its local veterans posts.
Sabrosky says the local veterans posts have not been „bought-out,” in contrast to our national leaders and institutions or even the national leadership of the VFW, American Legion, and other large veterans organizations. Sabrosky says these posts are not aware of their own power, and deploy usually only in support veterans benefits and issues. Were a single local veterans post to issue a call to its local, not national, media, for prosecutions for 911, the sea change would begin.
Dr. Alan Sabrosky: Israel behind 9/11, Part II
http://mrfriendsblog.blogspot.com/
“Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event- like a new Pearl Harbor.”
Dr. Alan Sabrosky has written yet another brilliant article about a subject that I write frequently about here: the fact that the state of Israel and criminal elements in the U.S. government (many of whom are Jews with ties directly to Israel, all of whom are Zionist traitors) were behind the FALSE FLAG/INSIDE JOB 9/11 fraud. And I’m using the word “fraud” now to describe what happened on 9/11. I’m pretty convinced almost everything described by the media, by our political and military officials and others in the limelight, about what happened that day is a complete farce, including many of the passengers (seehere and here), videos (see here and here), and airplanes. We’ve leave that discussion for another time. I want to focus on Dr. Sabrosky’s article today. By the way, Dr. Sabrosky was interviewed by Dr. Kevin Barrett on July 5th, and those interested can listen to that interview here.
I have written about Dr. Alan Sabrosky, a former U.S. Marine and easily one of the most strategic analytical thinkers in the country, before. He argues, quite correctly in my opinion, that 9/11 is theschwerpunkt, or the strategic center of gravity, in analyzing anything that is occurring geopolitically or militarily. And I agree: 9/11 is what all this madness we’re seeing right now boils down to. And we have to address the fact that all of the evidence, literally, points to this operation being carried out by Israeli intelligence, which was facilitated primarily by an organized criminal network in the U.S. This criminal network consists of the Jewish-owned corporate media, the owners of the towers and other private actors, and Zionist agents and puppets controlling all key positions of power in the U.S. government.
Of course, anyone analyzing the events of 9/11 knows full well that what happened that day could not have occurred without tactical and logistical support by elements in the U.S. government and media, and Sabrosky recognizes this in his piece “Demystifying 9/11: Israel and the Tactics of Mistake“:
I am also absolutely certain as a strategic analyst that 9/11 itself, from which all else flows, was a classic Mossad-orchestrated operation. But Mossad did not do it alone. They needed local help within America (and perhaps elsewhere) and they had it, principally from some alumni of PNAC (the misnamed Project for a New American Century) and their affiliates within and outside of the US Government (USG), who in the 9/11 attacks got the “catalytic event” they needed and craved to take the US to war on Israel’s behalf, only eight months after coming into office.
While it’s clear to me, and I think anyone who really looks at the evidence, 9/11 was in fact a classic “Mossad-orchestrated operation” (to use Sabrosky’s words), the role of the Jewish owned mainstream media was a crucial factor in pushing the American public to accept the official mythology of 9/11. We were told instantly exactly what the perpetrators had (rather poorly in hindsight) scripted: bin Laden and his cohort of Arab terrorists crashed hijacked airliners into the World Trade Center buildings in New York and the Pentagon, while a 4th hijacked airliner was heroically overtaken by the passengers on board and later crashed into a field in Pennsylvania. Dr. Sabrosky expands on this concept explaining how the official story became imbedded in the consciousness of Americans through repeat of the Big Lie. He writes:
As the war in Afghanistan for very dubious reasons extended into a war in Iraq for even more specious ones, the essential USG view of 9/11 became embedded in the public ethos. The 9/11 Commission Report, despite being handicapped when it was prepared and later revealed to have been deeply flawed, still appeared as the basic reference work on the attacks. Details may have been compromised, but the prevailing view was that 19 Arab hijackers had flown four planes into three buildings and one crash site, and that was the end of it. This was the position taken by the Bush Administration in 2001, and reaffirmed a decade later by the Obama Administration. Politicians of every stripe, most pundits and rafts of Protestant pastors (mainly evangelical) added their endorsements.
Sabrosky goes on to explore the obstacles that have arisen as a result of the rise of those of us interested in exploring what really happened on 9/11:
Potentially far more significant than individual musings was the gradual appearance of dissent that eventually crystallized in the so-called “9/11 Truth” movement, which rapidly proliferated into scores of major and many minor organizations and websites dissecting the attacks, the Commission report, the motivations and agendas of assorted elected and appointed officials, and alternatives to the orthodox view. But “9/11 Truthers” have been doing their version of the Maoist “Hundred Flowers” Campaign, throwing out so many different assessments of so many different aspects of so many different issues that the core message has been lost. Nor is it a matter of too little evidence invalidating the USG position on 9/11 being available, but too much to permit a clear focus on what happened (so many trees no one can really see the forest). […]
The real difficulty with much, but not all, of the effort to critique and question the official US position on 9/11 is that the “9/11 Truth” proponents have been unable to communicate their concerns – much less any conclusions – to the general public in any significant way. So much of the discussion is only partially comprehensible to some within the movement, largely unknown to the general US public, and so complicated in all its dimensions to those who do become aware of it that they fail to follow up on the arguments. […]
I would generally agree with this assessment. The 9/11 Truth movement has focused on debunking the official government conspiracy theory, pointing out all the inconsistencies, falsehoods, distortions and outright fabrications presented by the U.S. government and amplified by the Zionist owned media. The problem is- there are so many inconsistencies and so much research being done surrounding the FALSE FLAG/INSIDE JOB on 9/11, that there is not a clear central message that people can identify and accept as a legitimate explanation of what happened that day and why. There are those that are trying very hard to explain these things in as simple terms as possible, and to identify the culprits behind the attacks, but the overall central message of the movement is quite scattered.
So Sabrosky is correct, in my view, when he says that “much of the discussion is only partially comprehensible to some within the movement, largely unknown to the general US public, and so complicated in all its dimensions to those who do become aware of it that they fail to follow up on the arguments.” This is, of course, quite a poor reflection on our society, and the status of independent thinking in this country in general, that we cannot have civilized, intelligent discussions about the most monumental, game-changing event in recent memory (Fukushima may surpass 9/11 in the very near future).
Dr. Sabrosky argues that those of us working to bring to justice those responsible for the 9/11 FALSE FLAG/INSIDE JOB need to focus on World Trade Center building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that collapsed at free fall speed into its own footprint. Building 7 is the smoking gun when it comes to 9/11. Dr. Sabrosky writes:
What is not open to debate, however, is that WTC-7 — the third tower to collapse that day, and the only one not hit by a plane — absolutely was brought down by a controlled demolition, as anyone not trying to shield the attackers knows from a real-time video of its collapse. That is, WTC-7 went straight down into its own footprint in seconds without any visible catastrophic external trauma, which means only some catastrophic internal trauma could have brought it down. And if it had been wired for a controlled demolition, then so were the other towers (WTC-1 and WTC-2) that collapsed. That gives the plane impacts a gruesome cosmetic role, designed explicitly to conceal the true cause of the collapse of the buildings, while shocking the public into something akin to numbness.
The case of WTC-7 has long been known to critics of the US government position on 9/11. What does not seem to have been fully appreciated, at least at first (this is changing somewhat now), is that it is not merely “an” issue, but the single issue that can be used simply, directly to the American public, and effectively to discredit the US Government’s case, and thus its rationale for so many fallacies and misdeeds: not only needless foreign wars (Afghanistan being a “pump-priming” conflict to get the US into war in the region, and to lay the groundwork for later wars), but a substantial infringement of American civil liberties under the misbegotten “Patriot Act,” the unbelievably widespread acceptance of torture (including a technique openly named “Palestinian Hanging,” which assuredly did not originate in Boston and says something about Israeli habits), and the creation of known and secret prisons and detention centers in various countries.
Of course, there is a whole laundry list of evidence one could point to to debunk and refute the official government conspiracy theory of what happened on 9/11, but focusing on Building 7 should be the main starting point for those of us interested in spreading the truth and exposing those behind this fraudulent event.
The following analysis proffered by Dr. Sabrosky is of extreme importance:
The provenance of the 9/11 attacks becomes even clearer once they are examined as a classic exercise in covert operations. Generally speaking, there are three requirements for evaluating the origin and prospects for success of all covert intelligence operations: (a) motivation, (b) expertise, and (c) local support for access to the target and post-attack evasion and escape.
Let us look first at motivation. It is a bitter commentary on how far the US has gone from its strategic requirements and its own principles that so many movements and governments around the world not only dislike and distrust the US, but hate it with a passion and with better cause than I care to think about. I recently came across a remark by a Jesuit priest to the effect that “Every time I hear that Israel is America’s only friend in the Middle East, I remember that before Israel, America had no enemies in the Middle East” – a point well worth remembering.
But the interesting thing about the assorted movements and governments that might have an actual or perceived reason to do harm to the US, is that all but one has had a negative incentive to do that: to punish the US for some actual or assumed failings or misdeeds. The one exception is Israel. It has no negative incentives at all (I exclude some real fringe fanatics), simply because without US aid and diplomatic support, it would find itself in even worse straits than did apartheid-era South Africa, and with better cause. But it is the one state with a positive incentive, if it believed it could get away with it, which is to enrage the American public against Muslims generally and Arabs in particular, and to make the US an active belligerent in the region – spending American lives and treasure in the service of Israel’s interests.
Expertise is different and more diffuse. There are many intelligence and special operations forces in the world with the expertise to wire large urban structures for a controlled demolition. There are many combat engineer units in many countries that could do the same thing. And there are many private firms that specialize in them as well. Yet neither Al-Qaeda as an organization, nor any of its known affiliates – much less the 19 named Arabs supposedly on those four planes – possessed that expertise, or anything even remotely close to it; had they done so, the Green Zone in Baghdad would have been a pile of rubble.
But it is local support that is the crucial determinant. All well-crafted covert operations require some measure of local support, official or unofficial, unless the target area is so irredeemably hostile that none is available. Any domestic or foreign intelligence agency targeting the WTC would absolutely have required it, and Mossad would be better placed than any other to access such support for entry, access, execution and escape.
This is especially true, given the security company overseeing the WTC. CIA and/or Defense Department personnel (which is not the same as the CIA or the Defense Department as organizations) could have had access, but only if that had Israeli endorsement – one does not casually cut open walls, implant explosives, run cables and wire everything together in buildings with state-of-the-art electronic surveillance and 24/7 on-site security. Mossad would have no such need for those niceties, given the ownership of the WTC and the management of the company overseeing its security. Remember that we are not talking about large numbers of people in any case: given time to prepare the three buildings and protection from detection, as few as a dozen could have sufficed, a number small enough to be effectively unnoticed in a large organization.
This is a rock solid analysis of the situation surrounding the FALSE FLAG/INSIDE JOB on 9/11 from a former Marine Corps officer who knows specifically about this kind of stuff. If anyone reading this can dispute or rationally critique what was just laid out above, please enlighten me and the other readers in the comments section here.
I’d like to wrap up this analysis of Dr. Sabrosky’s article by excerpting the five key points recapped in the conclusion of the article:
So let us recapitulate the basic conclusions of this analysis. First, the core official US Government position on 9/11 is that any and all aspects of it are directly attributable to 19 named Arabs on 4 planes, conducting a terrorist operation planned and executed by Osama bin Laden’s Al-Qaeda. This position is at best incomplete, and at worst a complete fabrication engineered by those directly or indirectly responsible for what happened on 9/11, and the wars afterward.
Second, Al-Qaeda and many different countries and groups had negative reasons, real or contrived, to want to harm the US. But only Israel and its neoconservative wing in the US had a positive incentive to do so, which was to enrage Americans and make the US an active belligerent against Muslim countries, thereby cementing its bonding to Israel and Israel’s interests.
Third, there is no doubt that fully-loaded civilian airliners, especially with nearly-full fuel loads, impacting the Twin Towers (WTC-1 and WTC-2) would do great damage to those buildings, although even under extraordinary circumstances could not precipitate a chain of events leading to their collapse. And there is absolutely no way that those airliners impacting 800-1000 feet above the ground could have produced visible and audible secondary explosions in those buildings at ground level, nor precipitated the collapse of a third building (WTC-7)which was not hit by any aircraft and had no massive external trauma from debris produced by the Twin Towers. [Note by me, John Friend: I have serious doubts about the supposed „civilian airliners” hitting the Twin Towers. Please read Killtown’s excellent piece, „Why They Didn’t Use Planes To Hit The WTC” if you want to understand why I have major doubts about the airplanes hitting the buildings]
Fourth, Al-Qaeda – and perhaps other groups as well – had the theoretical capability to carry out a simultaneous four-plane hijacking, perhaps flying the aircraft to Cuba (the four 9/11 aircraft should have been able to make a one-way flight there at the beginning of their operational day without difficulty, depending on their actual loads), which would have been spectacular in itself. But neither Al-Qaeda nor any of their affiliates had the expertise and local support necessary to allow them the needed access to any of the buildings at the World Trade Center, to cut open the walls and wire them for controlled demolition, and then to escape and evade afterward.
Fifth and finally, in addition to being unique in having a positive incentive to make the 9/11 attacks,only Israel had the essential expertise and local support required to bring down the three World Trade Center buildings with controlled demolitions, and the leverage within and around the US Government to let their operatives evade detection, to be released without fanfare if apprehended unexpectedly, and to cloak their actions from public scrutiny – all of which happened on and after 9/11.
All wars are based on lies and deceptions. They are instigated and manufactured through the evil machinations of those who benefit and profit off of those waging the wars. Whether we’re talking about Pearl Harbor and the official mythology of that event, or more recently 9/11, it’s become quite evidence to those of us out here paying attention that Zionist bankers and the governments that facilitate their criminality and pillaging manufacture war for profit and their geopolitical interest. And, in my opinion, 9/11 is the ultimate manifestation of this, and in all likelihood the “catastrophic and catalyzing” event needed to facilitate the final implementation of the master plan for an international fascist dictatorship. And I say that sincerely, knowing how radical an idea that may be for some of you out there reading this. But, it needs to be said, and I’m not afraid to say it anymore.
So I’m going to keep on saying it until we finally arrest and charge with treason those responsible for carrying out this tremendous psyop on the people of the world. Israel was behind 9/11 folks. They were facilitated by criminal, traitorous elements in the U.S. government, including the military and intelligence agencies, private sector and media. We have all the proof in the world to document these facts. Take a look, it is no longer in dispute who was behind 9/11. I wake up everyday thinking of what I can do to expose these criminals, and bring them to justice. Maybe I’m weird, maybe I’m an “extremist,” but after all we’ve been through as a result of the false reality set in motion due to 9/11, there’s no going back. Who’s with me?
http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2011/07/17/dr-alan-sabrosky-israel-behind-911-part-ii/
Middle East atemporal 
[…] via middleeastatemporal.wordpress.com […]
Pingback de Dr. Alan Sabrosky: Israel behind 9/11. US military knows. « 9/11 Controlled Demolition — iulie 18, 2011 @ 10:11 am |
[…] via middleeastatemporal.wordpress.com […]
Pingback de Dr. Alan Sabrosky: Israel behind 9/11. US military knows. « 911Investigate — iulie 18, 2011 @ 10:11 am |
[…] via middleeastatemporal.wordpress.com […]
Pingback de Dr. Alan Sabrosky: Israel behind 9/11. US military knows. « 911UnitedWeInvestigate — iulie 18, 2011 @ 10:12 am |
[…] ≈ Leave a Comment via middleeastatemporal.wordpress.com […]
Pingback de Dr. Alan Sabrosky: Israel behind 9/11. US military knows. « PetrUsa001.wordpress.com — iulie 18, 2011 @ 10:15 am |
[…] July 18, 2011 in Uncategorized via middleeastatemporal.wordpress.com […]
Pingback de Dr. Alan Sabrosky: Israel behind 9/11. US military knows. « USNewsReport — iulie 18, 2011 @ 10:15 am |
[…] July 18, 2011 in News via middleeastatemporal.wordpress.com […]
Pingback de Dr. Alan Sabrosky: Israel behind 9/11. US military knows. « WorldNewsRecord — iulie 18, 2011 @ 10:15 am |
[…] July 18, 2011 in News via middleeastatemporal.wordpress.com […]
Pingback de Dr. Alan Sabrosky: Israel behind 9/11. US military knows. « NewsRecord — iulie 18, 2011 @ 10:42 am |