“The inmates are running the asylum!”–variation on a quote attributed to Charlie Chaplin
The situation is quite absurd: Bibi Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of Israel, gives a new twist to the old term, “Cry, Bibi! Cry!”, which captures to a “t” his distress at not getting the war he wanted, as Mike Rivero has explained below.
And as though to demonstrate that the President of the United States, Barack Obama, himself believes childish fantasies that no person above the age of 12 continues to accept, he has also appeared at the UN to assert that “Al Qaeda has been weakened and Osama bin Laden is no more” and by subtle implication reaffirm the “official account” of 9/11, according to which 19 Islamic terrorists had hijacked four commercial carriers, outfoxed the most sophisticated air defense system in the world, committing the atrocities of 9/11 under the control of a man in a cave in Afghanistan, who would die–for the second time–to promote the political agenda, not this time of Bush and Cheney, but of Barack Obama.
It would be reassuring if he would display an more candid appreciation of reality than the Israeli Prime Minister. Beginning with Obama, while his language is smoother and less obvious in its intent, the leaders of what are arguably the two most influential nations in the world are both performing in ways that not only embarrass themselves but the nations they represent. Perhaps the most interesting aspect was his remarks about the death of Ambassador Christopher Stevens in Libya, where he could have mentioned Al Qaeda or the Green Party, had Obama believed they were involved, which suggests that he actually believes other agents were involved, especially since it occurred not at the Embassy but at a safe house, where the Ambassador’s location would only have been known to a small group in confidence, which means that it was a tiny “inside job”. Gordon Duff has address some of these issues in his latest appearance on Press TV: Mossad organized attack on US consulate in Benghazi: Analyst
Obama’s presentation at the UN
During his speech to the United Nations on Tuesday, 25 September 2012, Barack Obama made the obligatory denunciations of Iran’s nuclear energy program and begs the question by taking for granted that Iran is pursuing the development of nuclear weapons, when Iran has disavowed their pursuit and 16 US intelligence agencies have agreed, which suggests that Obama is not paying attention to his own best sources of information:
“Let me be clear: America wants to resolve this issue through diplomacy, and we believe that there is still time and space to do so. But that time is not unlimited. We respect the right of nations to access peaceful nuclear power, but one of the purposes of the United Nations is to see that we harness that power for peace. Make no mistake: a nuclear-armed Iran is not a challenge that can be contained.
“It would threaten the elimination of Israel, the security of Gulf nations, and the stability of the global economy. It risks triggering a nuclear-arms race in the region, and the unraveling of the non-proliferation treaty. That is why a coalition of countries is holding the Iranian government accountable. And that is why the United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.”
He seems oblivious of the fact that Iran has disavowed the pursuit of nuclear weapons; that Iran has not attacked any other country for more than 300 years; that Iran has signed the NPT; that Iran has allowed inspectors into its facilities; and that Israel has 200-600 or more of these little beauties; that Israel has not signed the NPT; and that Israel will not allow inspectors into its facilities. Moreover, while Obama, like Netanyahu, makes exaggerated claims about the consequences of Iran possessing nukes, such an eventuality would do far more to promote stability in the Middle East than for Israel alone to possess them. He does not appear to have thought this through.
In a brilliant article by Saman Mohammadi, “Obama Defends False 9/11 Narrative And Absolves USrael of Guilt For Middle East Chaos In Bizarre UN Speech”, the author observes that Obama makes additional claims about the Middle East and 9/11 that are also seriously misleading and unjustifiable, including:
* that the recent protests in the Middle East were provoked entirely by the YouTube trailer for the film, “Innocence of Muslims.” But, as he observes,
Obama failed to mention that, prior to the release of the trailer, multiple and illegal U.S. occupations of Muslim countries after the false flag September 11 events had already made Muslims angry at the United States government. Rage against the godless and Evil Empire was brewing way before any talk of an anti-Islam film surfaced in the Middle East. Obama clearly lives in an alternate universe. According to his worldview, Washington’s unconditional support for the terrorist state in Israel isn’t as big of a deal in the Muslim world as the airing of a 12 minute film trailer mocking Prophet Muhammad.
It shouldn’t be surprising to see Obama lie so profusely in a major international speech. After all, lying is the biggest cornerstone of his re-election strategy. His biggest lie is that he ordered the death of Osama Bin Laden in Pakistan. Only Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu tells more lies on the U.N. stage. The truth is that Obama has killed more women and children with his drones than actual terrorists. The truth is that without deception Obama wouldn’t be President. The truth is that this naked emperor has nothing to stand on except lies.
* that the United States remains a bastion of freedom of speech, when the “freedom of speech” he most supports is for those who support him:
Obama’s “defense of free speech” does not include ideas and truths that contradict his statements.Obama believes infreedom of speech in Libya, Egypt, and Syria, but not in America, where it is constrained by the label “conspiracy theory.” What is Obama’s answer to the family members of the victims of 9/11 when they call for free speech in the U.S. press regarding 9/11? Silence.
It is easy to support free speech in a foreign society, but it doesn’t count unless you also support free speech in yourown society. I’ll be more impressed with Obama if he defended the speech of 9/11 truth-tellers, supported the speech of the Occupy Wall Street movement, and apologized to the world for lying about killing Bin Laden. Until then, this hypocrite cannot be taken seriously.
The second death of Osama bin Laden
Everyone knows that Barack Obama took out Osama bin Laden during that daring raid on his compound in Pakistan, right? There was even that famous photograph of Obama, Biden and Hillary watching as it went down. However, as Leon Panetta, Director of the CIA, explained there had been no coverage for the first 20-25 minutes, where these assaults only take five minutes or less. Osama bin Laden actually died of medical complications on or about December 15, 2001 and was buried in an unmarked grave. An article by Gordon Duff, subtitled, “Hunt for Bin Laden a National Shame”, had appeared already in December 2009, which began:
The embarassment of having Secretary of State Clinton talk about bin Laden in Pakistan was horrific. He has been dead since December 13, 2001 and now, finally, everyone, Obama, McChrystal, Cheney, everyone who isn’t nuts is finally saying what they have known for years. However … Since we spent 200 million dollars on “special ops” looking for someone we knew was dead, who is going to jail for that? Since Bush, Rumsfeld and Cheney continually talked about a man they knew was dead, now known to be for reasons of POLITICAL nature, who is going to jail for that?
Why were tapes brought out, now known to be forged, as legitimate intelligence to sway the disputed 2004 election in the U.S.? . . . The bin Laden scam is one of the most shameful acts ever perpetrated against the American people. We don’t even know if he really was an enemy, certainly he was never the person that Bush and Cheney said. In fact, the Bush and bin Laden families were always close friends and had been for many years.
Scholars for 9/11 Truth published an editorial about it. David Ray Griffin wrote a book on it, Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive? Nicholas Kollerstrom has an article about it, “Osama bin Laden: 1957-2001″, which means that there really is no doubt about it. Obama was on the hot seat, not only over his phony birth certificate but also for keeping Guantanamo open and for having troops based in Pakistan at the time. By claiming that the “tip” about Osama’s presence had come from Guantanamo and using troops stationed in Pakistan, he was able to sweep the birth certificate issue into the newsroom’s wastebasket but concurrently justify keeping the base open and troops in Pakistan.
It was a brilliant ploy and, if it was necessary for most of the SEALS who had allegedly participated in the raid to die in an unusual helicopter crash, that’s one of the prices of combat, alas. And now the great to-do about the book by the SEAL who claims to have been present when bin Laden was killed appears to be one more psyop embedded within another, but where he and others did not believe the man they killed looked like Osama. Perhaps the effort to suppress the book is because it gets too close to the truth about another contrived event, where the principal pastime of our intel agencies turns out to be committing fabricated events and then covering them up! Here’s Mike Rivero’s on Bibi’s latest stunt.
by Mike Rivero
Netanyahu didn’t get any traction at the UN today. Indeed his bomb chart has become an object of ridicule in the alternative media. By now he is throwing a huge tantrum. He wants his war and Netanyahu is a man used to always getting what he wants. There are only three things Netanyahu can do now to get the war with Iran going before the Israeli elections next month.
(2) The second option is a false-flag attack somewhere in the world to be blamed on Iran, but that is a very chancy option given the video of WIMEA lobbyist Clawson actually selling the idea that a false flag to start the war with Iran is a great idea.
(3) The third and final option, and the one I am starting to think is the most likely, relates to the sudden flurry of media stories and statements by people like Joseph Lieberman about how Iranian hackers are attacking the US fin…. (Senator Lieberman has also been pressuring Obama to sign an executive order to take over the internet.) Of course, the common sense approach still applies. Why would Iran, which wishes to avoid a war, do something that provocative.
But we know that the US and Israel are behind the cyber-weapons like STUXNET, DUQU, FLAME, etc., taht these cyber-weapons were directed against Iran, and that one variantspecifically targeted banks in Lebanon and Iran. We also know that the US financial system is stretched to the breaking point, and we know that if the government of either Greece of Spain is driven from office by angry protests, credit default swaps sold by Wall Street against those debts come due, and there is no money to pay the claims. The Euro might even collapse, and that would trigger even more Credit Default Swaps.
So the final option, one that strikes me as very likely, is that Israel will take down the US financial computers, and blame it on Iran. This also gets Wall Street and Washington DC off the hook, because now the financial melt-down is an act of war, rather than the result of decades of Wall Street crime and corruption and the predations of Private Central Banks. US banks have already been hit with cyber attacks over the last two…, to set the stage. And this would also explain why the US corporate media has paid scant attention to the riots in Spain and Greece so that Americans still dependent on ABCNNBBCBS will remain oblivious to the fact that the Euro is falling apart.
This scenario also explains the testing of means to interfere with DNS to silence websites that may offer opposing interpretations of events (this too will be blamed on Iran).Such a cyber false-flag also gives the US Government the excuse to take total control of the internet so that those pesky truth-seeking bloggers don’t give the slaves uppity ideas that this is just another war-starting hoax like the attack on the USS Liberty or 9/11.
- Lessons in American History: Scapegoating
- Exclusive: Staging of Major Terror Attack on US Evident
- “Innocence of Muslims”, the GOP and World War III
- Nuclear Whistle Blowers Appeal Denied, Israels Nuclear Apartheid and The Real Deal About Iran
- Late May U.S. False Flag Likely
Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=224042